The Worst Snack of 2010
8 December 20, 2010
It was a difficult decision. Snack Girl has made her choice.
The Nabisco 100 calorie snack pack takes it for Worst Snack of 2010!
Why? Oh, so MANY reasons. I will enumerate why I think they deserve this distinction. They:
- Taste terrible.
- Use too much packaging (bad for the environment).
- Have almost zero nutritional value.
- Leave you hungry.
- Trick you into thinking you did something healthy (just 100 calories!).
- Are expensive ($3.00 a box).
What else can I say? These are a crappy choice in a world of much better choices for packaged snacks. See my list here of healthy packaged snacks: Healthy Packaged Snacks.
Snack Girl features a list of the Worst Snacks. And there were some serious runners-up to the Worst Snack of 2010. Here are some of the other contenders:
560 Calories For Your Rapid Consumption From McDonald's
You Can De-Ice an Aircraft With This New WORST Drink Winner
This Blueberry Muffin Has a Dark Secret
The worst snack in America?
Which Favorite Snack has 35 Ingredients?
I am SURE they are really bummed that they didn't win :)
Please share your nominees for the worst snack of 2010.